Avogadro2 github install#

'Which format has the least potential to be mucked up by anyone but the app's packagers?' AppImages! This is relevant as you's would be the packagers, so that means every bug would be more in your control, not third-parties!Īs AppImages have so few dependencies and the chief developer of the format has shown he is committed to his AppImages project (relevant in case a bug related to the AppImage format itself arises)-as he's been developing AppImages for significantly longer than Snaps and Flatpaks have been around-it seems unlikely that something could get broken that would be out of your hands.įlatpaks and Snaps, as they depend on their own respective package manager can be easily mucked up by four groups of people, other than the app's packagers: (1) the respective developers and (2) packagers of the package managers themselves, and (3) the respective developers and (4) packagers of the package manager's respective dependencies. 'Which format can be used on all modern distributions, without their packagers having to lift a finger?' AppImages! The only set in stone dependencies of AppImages are FUSE and a modern Linux system (with 'modern' being something that devs get to define in the way they build the AppImages).

Avogadro2 github install#

you don't need to install the package manager, then get the package manager to download and install the app and its deps), once you've downloaded them you can use them. Generally speaking AppImages are smaller than Flatpaks and Snaps, after accounting for dependencies, meaning faster downloads and they take no preparation, besides chmod +x'ing, to be used (i.e. The answer then would be simple: AppImages. 'Which format can I, an end-user, obtain and use as fast as possible?'